The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) Annual Meeting is the premier educational event for hospice and palliative medicine professionals. The meeting offers a wide range of educational sessions, networking opportunities, and exhibits from leading hospice and palliative care organizations. The 2025 Annual Meeting will be held in San Diego, California, from March 28-31. The AAHPM Abstract Submission site is now open for submissions. The deadline for abstract submissions is October 15, 2024. Abstract submissions are peer-reviewed and selected for presentation based on their scientific merit and relevance to the field of hospice and palliative medicine.
The AAHPM Annual Meeting is an excellent opportunity to share your research and learn from other hospice and palliative care professionals. The meeting offers a variety of educational sessions on topics such as pain management, symptom management, bereavement care, and ethical issues in hospice and palliative care. The meeting also offers opportunities to network with other hospice and palliative care professionals and learn about the latest products and services from leading hospice and palliative care organizations.
If you are involved in hospice or palliative care research, we encourage you to submit an abstract for the 2025 AAHPM Annual Meeting. The deadline for abstract submissions is October 15, 2024. For more information about the abstract submission process, please visit the AAHPM website.
AAHPM Abstract Submission 2025: Call for Proposals
Abstract Submission Timeline
The AAHPM Abstract Submission 2025 timeline is as follows:
- Abstract submission opens: [date]
- Abstract submission deadline: [date]
- Notification of abstract acceptance: [date]
- Early registration deadline: [date]
- Conference dates: [date] – [date]
Abstract Submission Guidelines
Authors are invited to submit abstracts for oral or poster presentations on a wide range of topics related to hospice and palliative medicine. Abstracts should be no more than 300 words in length and should include the following information:
- Title of the abstract
- Authors’ names and affiliations
- Abstract body
- Keywords
Abstracts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts in hospice and palliative medicine. The review process will be based on the following criteria:
- Originality and significance of the research
- Quality of the research design and methods
- Clarity and conciseness of the abstract
Abstract Submission Categories
Abstracts can be submitted in the following categories:
- Research
- Education
- Clinical Practice
- Policy and Advocacy
Authors are encouraged to submit abstracts that address the following priority areas:
Priority Areas for Research
– Symptom management at the end of life
– Care for vulnerable populations
– Advance care planning
– Palliative care integration
– Interdisciplinary collaboration
Priority Areas for Education
– Hospice and palliative care education for healthcare professionals
– Public education about hospice and palliative care
– Interdisciplinary education
– Cultural competence
– Ethical decision-making
Priority Areas for Clinical Practice
– Interdisciplinary team care
– Symptom management
– Advance care planning
– Care transitions
– Communication
Priority Areas for Policy and Advocacy
– Access to hospice and palliative care
– Reimbursement for hospice and palliative care services
– Public policy on end-of-life care
– Advocacy for vulnerable populations
– Quality of care
The Art of a Compelling Abstract: Submission Guidelines and Best Practices
Submission Guidelines
To ensure the highest quality of abstracts for review, AAHPM adheres to a comprehensive set of submission guidelines. These guidelines are designed to provide a clear and concise framework for researchers to present their work and promote a consistent review process. Adhering to these guidelines is essential for successful abstract submission and presentation.
Best Practices
Writing a Compelling Abstract
The abstract is the heart of your submission, and its impact can make or break your chances of selection for presentation. Here are some key best practices to ensure a compelling and impactful abstract:
- Clearly State Your Hypothesis or Aim: Begin your abstract with a concise and specific statement of your research question or hypothesis.
- Describe Your Methods and Results Objectively: Provide a brief overview of your methodology and highlight the most important results without overgeneralizing or drawing premature conclusions.
- Quantify Your Findings: Whenever possible, use numerical data to support your claims and demonstrate the significance of your findings.
- Highlight the Importance of Your Work: Explain how your research contributes to the field and why it is relevant to AAHPM’s mission.
- Proofread Carefully: Ensure that your abstract is free of grammatical errors, typos, and inconsistencies. First impressions matter, and a well-written abstract reflects positively on your work.
| Abstract Section | Word Limit |
|---|---|
| Title | 25 words |
| Background and Objectives | 150 words |
| Methods | 150 words |
| Results | 150 words |
| Conclusions | 50 words |
Enhancing the Impact of Your Abstract: Dissemination Strategies
Maximizing Reach and Impact
To maximize the reach and impact of your abstract, consider the following strategies:
- Present at the AAHPM Conference: This provides an immediate platform to share your research with attendees, network with experts, and generate interest in your work.
- Publish in the AAHPM Journal: Submit your abstract for consideration in the AAHPM Journal, which publishes cutting-edge research and perspectives in hospice and palliative medicine.
- Utilize Social Media: Share your abstract and conference attendance on social media platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn, using relevant hashtags to connect with researchers, clinicians, and the general public interested in hospice and palliative care.
Leveraging Partnerships
Collaborate with organizations and individuals to broaden the dissemination of your abstract and engage a wider audience.
- Professional Associations: Reach out to professional associations like the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO) or the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) to explore opportunities for presenting or publishing your work.
- Media Outlets: Contact healthcare-focused media outlets to pitch your abstract for inclusion in articles or press releases.
- Patient Advocacy Groups: Partner with patient advocacy groups to share your findings with those affected by hospice and palliative care, raising awareness and promoting understanding.
Creating Additional Materials
Develop supplementary materials to enhance the impact of your abstract and make your research more accessible.
| Material | Benefits |
|---|---|
| Slideshow Presentation: Create a visually engaging slideshow presentation to accompany your abstract at conferences or for online dissemination. | Visually illustrate your findings and make them more digestible for a broader audience. |
| Research Brief: Develop a one-page research brief summarizing your abstract’s key findings and implications. | Provide a concise and accessible overview of your research for quick reference and sharing. |
| Infographic: Create an infographic that visually represents your data and highlights your research’s impact. | Engage audiences with visually appealing and easily understandable information. |
A Deep Dive into the Review Process: Criteria and Expectations
Review Criteria
Abstracts are evaluated based on the following criteria:
- Significance: The abstract should address an important issue or question in palliative medicine.
- Innovation: The abstract should present new or innovative approaches to palliative care.
- Rigor: The abstract should be based on sound research methods and evidence.
- Clarity: The abstract should be written clearly and concisely, using precise language and appropriate terminology.
Review Process
Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of experts in palliative medicine. The review process is double-blind, meaning that reviewers do not know the identity of the authors.
Each abstract is scored on the four criteria listed above. The scores are then averaged to determine the overall score for the abstract. The highest-scoring abstracts are selected for presentation at the AAHPM conference.
Detailed Expectations for Innovation and Rigor
- Innovation:** Abstracts should demonstrate a clear understanding of the current state of palliative medicine and identify areas where new or improved approaches are needed. Proposals should be feasible, with a clear plan for implementation and evaluation.
- Rigor:** Abstracts should be based on sound research methods and evidence. Studies should be designed to answer a specific question or hypothesis, and the results should be reported accurately and objectively.
Aspect of Rigor Expectations Research Design Study design should be appropriate for the research question and use appropriate methods to collect and analyze data. Data Collection Data should be collected using valid and reliable methods, with appropriate sample size and sampling methods. Data Analysis Statistical analyses should be conducted appropriately and results interpreted correctly. Reporting Results should be presented clearly and concisely, with appropriate use of tables and figures. The Importance of Early Submission and Planning
Submitting your abstract early for the AAHPM conference in 2025 offers numerous advantages. Here’s why you should prioritize early action:
Increased Chances of Acceptance
Submitting your abstract early provides the review committee ample time to thoroughly evaluate your work and provide constructive feedback. Early submission allows for potential revisions and improvements before the final deadline.
Preferred Presentation Time Slots
Early abstract submissions give you a better chance of securing preferred presentation time slots. The conference organizers typically accommodate presenters who submit their abstracts early.
Networking Opportunities
Attending the conference early allows you to connect with fellow researchers, professionals, and potential collaborators from the field of hospice and palliative medicine.
Professional Recognition
Presenting your research at a nationally recognized conference like AAHPM enhances your professional profile and showcases your expertise in hospice and palliative medicine.
Enhanced Research Visibility
Your abstract will be included in the conference proceedings and published in a peer-reviewed journal, providing wider visibility for your research and its potential impact on the field.
Phase Timeline Abstract Submission Deadline March 15, 2025 Early Submission Incentive Deadline November 1, 2024 To ensure a successful abstract submission, consider the following timeline and incentives:
Collaborating on Multi-Author Abstracts: Tips for Success
1. Establish Clear Roles and Responsibilities
Define each author’s contributions, including data collection, writing specific sections, and editing. Assign timelines and ensure all members are aware of their tasks.
2. Communicate Effectively
Use regular communication channels such as email, phone, or video conferencing. Discuss ideas, provide feedback, and address any concerns or questions promptly.
3. Use Collaborative Writing Tools
Consider using tools such as Google Docs or Dropbox to facilitate real-time collaboration and tracking changes. This allows multiple authors to work on the abstract simultaneously.
4. Respect Perspectives and Opinions
Acknowledge that each author’s perspective and expertise may differ. Value their input and work together to find common ground while maintaining a respectful and professional environment.
5. Seek Feedback Early and Often
Share drafts with colleagues, mentors, or other abstract reviewers to obtain valuable feedback. This helps identify areas for improvement and ensures the abstract is well-written and compelling.
6. Proofread Carefully Before Submission
Proofread the final abstract meticulously for any errors in grammar, spelling, and formatting. Pay attention to consistency in style, citations, and references. Consider asking a trusted colleague to review the abstract for an additional perspective.
Promoting Diversity and Inclusion in Abstract Submissions
Representation of Underrepresented Groups
Encourage submissions from authors from diverse backgrounds, including racial and ethnic minorities, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and individuals with disabilities.
Inclusive Language and Terminology
Provide clear guidelines for authors to use inclusive language and terminology that respects all identities and experiences.
Accessibility
Ensure that the abstract submission platform is accessible to individuals with disabilities by providing alternative formats and assistive technologies.
Bias Mitigation
Employ strategies to mitigate bias in the review process, such as blind peer review or training reviewers on diversity and inclusion.
Mentorship and Support
Offer mentorship programs and support systems for authors from underrepresented groups to enhance their abstract submission skills.
Targeted Outreach
Actively reach out to potential authors from diverse backgrounds through targeted advertising and partnerships with organizations representing these groups.
Diversity and Inclusion Committee
Establish a dedicated diversity and inclusion committee to monitor progress, provide guidance, and address any challenges related to promoting diversity and inclusion in abstract submissions.
Diversity and Inclusion Committee Responsibilities – Monitor representation of underrepresented groups in abstract submissions – Review and update language and terminology guidelines – Collaborate with IT to ensure platform accessibility – Develop and implement bias mitigation strategies – Provide mentorship and support for authors from diverse backgrounds – Track and report on progress toward diversity and inclusion goals – Address any challenges or concerns related to diversity and inclusion Case Studies: Examples of High-Quality Abstracts
1. Introduction
Abstracts should provide a concise overview of research projects and should be written in a clear and concise manner. High-quality abstracts are well-written, informative, and engaging. They accurately represent the research project and its findings.
2. Purpose of Case Studies
Case studies can be used to illustrate how a particular concept or theory works in practice. They can also be used to compare and contrast different approaches to a problem.
### 3. Criteria for High-Quality Case Studies
High-quality case studies are:
- Well-written and easy to understand.
- Based on solid research.
- Relevant to the topic of the abstract.
- Thought-provoking and insightful.
4. Selecting a Case Study
When selecting a case study, it is important to consider the following factors:
- The relevance of the case study to the abstract.
- The quality of the research that was conducted.
- The availability of data.
5. Writing a Case Study Abstract
An abstract for a case study should include the following information:
- A brief description of the case study.
- The research methods that were used.
- The findings of the research.
- The implications of the research.
6. Example of a High-Quality Case Study Abstract
Criteria High-Quality Abstract Well-written and easy to understand The abstract is written in a clear and concise manner. It is easy to follow and understand. Based on solid research The abstract is based on solid research. The author cites credible sources and provides evidence to support their claims. Relevant to the topic of the abstract The abstract is relevant to the topic of the abstract. It provides information that is directly related to the topic. Thought-provoking and insightful The abstract is thought-provoking and insightful. It provides new insights into the topic and raises important questions. Troubleshooting Common Challenges: Feedback and Support
Technical Difficulties
If you encounter technical issues while submitting your abstract, reach out to the AAHPM support team via email or phone.
Content-Related Feedback
Seek input from colleagues, mentors, or peers to improve the scientific rigor and clarity of your abstract’s content.
Formatting Issues
Refer to the abstract submission guidelines and consult with the AAHPM support team if you face challenges with formatting.
Content Overload
Ensure that your abstract concisely conveys the key points and does not exceed the word limit.
Abstract Submission Deadline
Be aware of the abstract submission deadline and plan accordingly to avoid last-minute rushes.
Plagiarism and Ethical Concerns
Ensure that your abstract is original work and adheres to ethical guidelines for research and publication.
Feedback and Support Table
Contact Method Support Email aahpm@support.org Phone (800) 555-1212 Abstract Evaluation and Decision Process
The abstract evaluation process is rigorous and involves expert reviewers assessing your work’s scientific merit, originality, and relevance to the conference theme.
Notification of Abstract Acceptance
AHPM will notify you of the abstract acceptance or rejection decision via email. Reviewers’ feedback may also be provided for accepted abstracts.
Embracing Innovation in Abstract Submission: Tools and Resources
Streamlined Submission Process
Advanced submission portals allow authors to seamlessly navigate through the abstract submission process, ensuring a hassle-free experience.
Interactive Editing and Collaboration
Collaborate seamlessly with co-authors through real-time editing and tracking tools within the submission platform.
Enhanced Formatting and Preview
Interactive formatting tools and preview options enable authors to visualize their abstracts before submission, ensuring adherence to guidelines.
Dynamic Topic Matching
Intelligent algorithms analyze abstract content and suggest relevant topics and keywords for optimal visibility and reviewer assignment.
Customizable Submission Forms
Tailor abstract submission forms to specific conference requirements, capturing essential information while streamlining the review process.
Bulk Submission Options
Facilitate efficient submission for large teams or institutions by enabling bulk upload of multiple abstracts simultaneously.
AI-Powered Text Analysis
Utilize AI-powered tools to analyze abstract content, providing insights into trends and identifying common themes and areas for improvement.
Personalized Submission Tracking
Authors can track the status of their submissions in real-time, receiving email notifications and accessing detailed progress updates.
Online Review Management
Integrated review management systems enable reviewers to evaluate abstracts efficiently, access reviewer guidelines, and provide tailored feedback.
Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
Analyze abstract submission data to gain valuable insights into conference dynamics, author participation, and trending research areas.
Tool Feature Submission Portal Interactive submission process, collaboration tools Formatting Tools Real-time preview, customizable templates AI Text Analysis Trend identification, theme extraction Online Review Management Efficient review access, reviewer guidelines, feedback provision Reporting and Analytics Submission data analysis, insights into conference trends Aahpm Abstract Submission 2025
The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (AAHPM) is now accepting abstract submissions for its 2025 Annual Meeting. The meeting will be held in San Diego, California, from October 1-4, 2025.
The AAHPM Annual Meeting is the largest gathering of hospice and palliative medicine professionals in the world. The meeting provides an opportunity for attendees to learn about the latest research, best practices, and policy issues in the field.
Abstracts are invited on a wide range of topics related to hospice and palliative medicine, including:
- Clinical care
- Research
- Education
- Policy
- Ethics
AAHPM encourages submissions from a diverse range of perspectives, including clinicians, researchers, educators, policymakers, and advocates.
People Also Ask About Aahpm Abstract Submission 2025
When is the deadline for abstract submissions?
The deadline for abstract submissions is March 1, 2025.
What are the criteria for abstract submissions?
Abstracts should be no more than 500 words and should include:
- A clear and concise title
- A statement of the problem or hypothesis
- A description of the methods used
- A summary of the results
- A discussion of the implications of the findings
How are abstracts reviewed?
Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of experts in hospice and palliative medicine. The reviewers will assess the abstracts based on their originality, significance, and relevance to the field.
- Rigor:** Abstracts should be based on sound research methods and evidence. Studies should be designed to answer a specific question or hypothesis, and the results should be reported accurately and objectively.
